Any popular movie
for instance Hunger Games, Star War or famous Harry Potter, has part I, part II and part III. In the case of this blog, it is not because
the receiving rate of the first blog was enormously high so I decided to write it
up again. It is, unfortunately because what I wrote on my blog on September 16,
2012 happened again roughly ten days ago in Southern part of China. On December
3, authorities detained 20
labour activists and five are still under criminal charges until now.
Four years ago,
grass-root labour organisations in Guangzhou and Shenzhen faced severe
suppression. Local labour NGOs’ offices have to be shut down for no reason,
unknown persons came to those local labour NGOs’ offices, smashing all the
office equipment and also asked staffs at the labour organization to leave the
office immediately. Under that difficult circumstance, I raised a question:
Whether the state, or the government should be the protector or in fact, is a
gangster to bully her own citizen?
Chinese grass-roots NGOs have always faced difficult
challenges. Since the summer of 2012, grass-roots labour NGOs have encountered
various obstacles. Some have been asked by their landlords to move out of the
offices they rented, with no reasons given. Some have had their offices
vandalized by unknown people for unknown reasons. Some organizers have been
assaulted by unknown people, again, without obvious reasons. The situation has
continued and as we saw, on December 6th of this year, nine labour NGO organizers
were arrested; three of them are still detained. The only unchanged factor is,
we still don't know the reason for their arrest/detention. One may ask, is it
important to know the reason? It is important because a 'legitimate' government
as the Chinese government always claims to be, should protect her citizens from
'unknown' harassers and defend their personal safety. We therefore wonder why
those labour NGO organizers – whose aim is to help workers better their working
conditions, thereby helping the society to have more balanced industrial
relations – are suffering such difficulties. As such, I do think the government
owes her citizens an explanation for the detention of the labour NGO
organizers. The ironic fact is, the labour NGO organizers are the very ones who
most need the government's protection (this part of comment is also on red balloon)
I’d like to expand more on my point about whether the
Chinese government can provide a justified reason to her citizens. Four years
ago, China was under President Hu’s governance, the emphasis was on maintaining
stability, therefore from the government’s perspective; those grass-root labour
organisations were possible threats to the social stability. However, back then
the government failed to explain that why, if the labour NGOs aim to help
workers at conflicts of industrial relations, could pose any possible threats
to the government. Four years later, as we saw that those grass-root labour
NGOs once again, suffered from the severe suppression. At this moment, China is
under President Xi’s leadership to realise the ‘China Dream’. A justified
explanation is still missing in this action of suppression of those labour
NGOs, unless, if we assume that those labour NGOs and the immense number of
Chinese workers, whom are the backbone of the society are not in part of ‘China
dream’. If that is the case, we must ask, if the ‘China dream’ is selective,
which groups could be included in the ‘China dream’?
Finally, I sincerely hope, that I won’t need to repeat
what I wrote here anymore, four years is a long time, and one would expect a
country to change her strategy to interact with her people and society after
such a long period of time. Global academic in the labour studies also launched
a joint
petition to the Chinese government to release those grass-root labour
organisation staffs,
I sincerely hope, in the years to come that China not
only to fulfil her global market dream under the ‘one belt-one road’ blueprint,
but also to respect her people, to support the bottom of the society,
otherwise, the ‘China dream’ will always be only a dream.
